A Conspiracy Theory - To Steal the Office of the President

James Breedlove

Every day we hear about the stories of the creatures in the wooded areas and swamps or even in the outback areas of Alaska or Canada such as the Yeti or Bigfoot or such mythological creatures.  And many are very detail accounts, to include videos or photos of what they believe could have been a creature of sort.  But when examined the photos and video always seem to be at a distance; grainy or blurry or the person holding the camera just don't seem to be able to hold the camera worth crap.  Quite frankly after seeing that much of the video or photos, wither it was real or not I don't care.  To me it stinks of fakery and isn't that so of all the conspiracies we hear today.

We live in a new age where now the level of detail to a narrative is unmistakably intense and in depth; the difference between what is fake and what is not is incredibly difficult to tell.  Who would have thought that any of the modern day conspiracy theories would be true.  Only recently the stories seem to have taken a new life, in the land of reality.  So the media News and social media are out to get someone after all.  No fakeness to it.  It is quite evident with all the banned people out there and even the audacity a media group does to take vengeance on government simply because they don't like certain individuals, such as the President of the United States (POTUS).  Even as we see these things unfolding and everything that has been stated still goes on deaf ears.  We call it a dampening effect or obfuscation of the truth in the public sector.  For many years this has been practiced to allude people from the truth of the matter on various topics.  Take the UFO theory, for years so many different stories have been circulated that no one knows the truth, yet the stories keep occurring and different accounts of things that have been viewed appear in news and at groups of interest such as MUFON.  Does it make it any more real, sadly not.  Even if people are seeing objects in the sky, nobody today really listens much anymore.

If we take the principle that we can make things disappear by flooding the news with various accounts of the truth or even lies  why wouldn't it be practical to do this stuff when it comes to politics.  Day in and day out we hear of events in the news or read it online and it becomes numb to us after a day or two of seeing the same kind of head lines, especially when dealing with the same people as a matter of subject.  That is why certain bits of information seem to just be fleeing by us... Because about the time we have become complacent they add more relevant material, but people are tired of hearing about the subject.  Two weeks down the road people wake up and wonder why then is the story so different now.  For the most part people are lazy and do not go back to research what happen that we missed, it gets chocked up to a conspiracy is occurring and somehow someone is getting away with what ever that has been said or done.  Yet we don't know that evidence had been submitted that puts new light on the subject.

For over four years we went through a media war against an administration and a party trying to bury the other parties candidate for President.  Even after they won the smear campaign did not go away but kept on and on going.  The public very quickly becomes desensitized to the day to day events as it pertains to the same subject.  However some people keep listening but it become sort of a soap opera.  Over a sort period of time media starts taking a bias stance on the subject, and everyone listening in starts leaning the direction the media pushes the narrative.  While of course other's do not buy the mass media's account and stand by the relevant things they are finding about what is going on... both sides or even three sides start to appear in media and online.  Opinions start getting varied and the facts eventually start getting dis enfranchised with the subject. We get a far left, far right and what the media says view but at this time if just chiming in; we are lost.  The orchestrator's purpose and cause have been achieved, we are back to UFO stories again.... this is obfuscation.  No longer is the things which are true trustable, nor can we tell that lies being spoken are just lies.  Yet opinions are still being formed and the story and narrative takes on a life of its own.  Mission accomplished.  Who loses, everyone but the one who started the disinformation campaign or psyop mission.

As we discussed, kind of how these things get started, now apply this theory to a grander scale one for which the one side has already plotted the general out come of such a warfare campaign against its opponent.  They have factored in the likelihood of the public buying into their narrative and even if some do not they have laid different game plans out to be able to spin the story in different directions.  They are able to do this as they are well funded and have much resources or advisors to help keep the smear going.  As things die out they have new plots already cooking and several angles based on the other sides daily or weekly activities; they use any negative events to build on their plot.  They only lay out their plot when enough is accumulated to do damage.  In some cases they may even be able to leverage events of nature or demographic events such as lawlessness to their favor to push a narrative, but only if it can be weigh it to their advantage.   Then the conspirators get a break, and have a funder or sponsor willing to go an extra-mile to help their cause.  Now we have funded riots in various towns and locations that is known to be able to spark a large public following.  Using the already bias media camp to their favor they now can drive a campaign.  The plot or pathway to success can not be planned to how they will overcome their opponents.  

Most of the time conspiracies are not deeply involved, just as long as they can be sold down stream in a way, where it seems credible.  If people want to believe a certain way and the plot of the conspiracy theory leads into that belief they will be successful; the conspiracy to spill a fiction story or even the truth sometimes even if embellished somewhat.  What are we to do?  Equip with the knowledge that this is a common place event, we may not have been aware of until recent days, but we know now.  We should take the time to investigate or do research where our interest have been sparked.  Or we can forget whatever we hear from the mass media and stick to sideline stories; from sources that have little to gain from the news that speaks in bias and negative ways.  We need only the news with out all of its embellishments. 

A giant Kraken "Octopus" attacks ships out at sea.  Story of Clash of the Titans 1981. 

END.